PunditGuy — Home

Month: November 2005

Thank Your Lucky Stars

A few more votes and this guy could have been President. What a scary thought.

“I don’t want to diminish the threat of terrorism at all, it is extremely serious, but on a long-term global basis, global warming is the most serious problem we are facing.” – Al Gore

If you’re a Democrat, I’m sure this statement doesn’t bother you at all. And you probably think that thing that happened on 9/11 was just an unfortunate event that the U.S. brought on itself, most likely because of George W. Bush, the evil liar who fabricated that whole “Iraq has nukes” thing.

I can’t even imagine the kind of danger we’d be in right now if John Kerry was elected.

Simple Appeasement

Just when the polls show that people want the troops out of Iraq, a story like this one is miraculously reported. It works in America, and it works in Britain too.

British troops could leave Iraq by the end of next year, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said on Sunday.

“We don’t want British forces forever in Iraq. Within one year — I think at the end of 2006 — Iraqi troops will be ready to replace British forces in the South,” Talabani told ITV’s Jonathan Dimbleby program.

Talabani also said, however, that an immediate withdrawal of foreign forces would be a “catastrophe” for Iraq and would lead to civil war.

The press and the left desperately want a timeline, or simply a date as to when coalition troops will leave Iraq and come home. Yet we know that a pre-announcement of troop withdrawal will only help the terrorists. So, instead of sticking to our guns and stating that the war will be over when we say it’s over, we draw straws and let the winner be the source for a story of false hope.

And you know what? It works.

This story will satisfy the press for another couple of months, when they’ll demand yet another timetable. The U.S. and our Allies will easily find another General, or official somewhere who will be willing to stand up and throw out another date.

Come late January, I’ll expect to read another one of these stories.

1,100 People Not Willing to Die For Saddam

And who could blame ’em?

Some 1,100 Iraqi lawyers have withdrawn from Saddam Hussein’s defense team, citing insufficient protection following the slayings of two peers representing co-defendants of the ousted Iraqi leader.

In a statement obtained Sunday, the lawyers did not say whether Saddam’s chief Iraqi attorney, Khalil al-Dulaimi, was among those who withdrew. But the statement said other members of the team in Baghdad were continuing their duties “under complex and dangerous circumstances.”

How the tables have turned. The Baath Party spread so much fear over the Iraqi people that no one was willing to do or say anything that didn’t align with the wishes of Saddam. Now there are those who will do anything to prevent the chance that Saddam might return to power. So, you have defense lawyers who quit to avoid an untimely death and defense witnesses who won’t come forward because they fear reprisals.

This trial is going to make Nuremberg look like Romper Room.

A Cool Million

If the CIA can’t do it, John McClane will.

Actor Bruce Willis tells MSNBC’s Rita Cosby that he’ll offer $1,000,000 to any civilian who turns in Osama Bin Laden, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, or Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi.

h/t The Corner

Burning Bush

9:29 AM PST – George W. Bush is on fire. He’s giving a Veterans Day speech right now in Tobyhanna, PA., and he’s blasting the Democrats with both barrels.

Defending the march to war, Bush said that foreign intelligence services and Democrats and Republicans alike were convinced at the time that former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.

“Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and mislead the American people about why we went to war,” Bush said.

He said those critics have made those allegations although they know that a Senate investigation “found no evidence” of political pressure to change the intelligence community’s assessments related to Saddam’s weapons program.

He said they also know that the United Nations passed more than a dozen resolutions citing Saddam’s development and possession of weapons of mass destruction.

“More than 100 Democrats in the House and the Senate who had access to the same intelligence voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power,” Bush said.

The Most Important Three Paragraphs

“Our debate at home must also be fair-minded. One of the hallmarks of a free society and what makes our country strong is that our political leaders can discuss their differences openly, even in times of war. When I made the decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power, Congress approved it with strong bipartisan support. I also recognize that some of our fellow citizens and elected officials didn’t support the liberation of Iraq. And that is their right, and I respect it. As President and Commander in Chief, I accept the responsibilities, and the criticisms, and the consequences that come with such a solemn decision.”

“While it is perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began. Some Democrats and anti-war critics are now claiming we manipulated the intelligence and misled the American people about why we went to war. These critics are fully aware that a bipartisan Senate investigation found no evidence of political pressure to change the intelligence community’s judgments related to Iraq’s weapons programs. They also know that intelligence agencies from around the world agreed with our assessment of Saddam Hussein. They know the United Nations passed more than a dozen resolutions citing his development and possession of weapons of mass destruction. Many of these critics supported my opponent during the last election, who explained his position to support the resolution in the Congress this way: ‘When I vote to give the President of the United States the authority to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, it is because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a threat, and a grave threat, to our security.’ That’s why more than 100 Democrats in the House and the Senate, who had access to the same intelligence voted to support removing Saddam Hussein from power.”

“The stakes in the global War on Terror are too high, and the national interest is too important, for politicians to throw out false charges. These baseless attacks send the wrong signal to our troops and to an enemy that is questioning America’s will. As our troops fight a ruthless enemy determined to destroy our way of life, they deserve to know that their elected leaders who voted to send them to war continue to stand behind them. Our troops deserve to know that this support will remain firm when the going gets tough. And our troops deserve to know that whatever our differences in Washington, our will is strong, our Nation is united, and we will settle for nothing less than victory.” – George Bush

Video

MORE: MSNBC | AP | WaPo | Stop the ACLU | Pardon My English | ABC News | Protein Wisdom |

Could Someone Please Check the Water on Capitol Hill?

First, there was news of the “Republican Main Street Partnership”, a group of Republicans who successfully pushed for a cave-in on ANWR. Later we find out that moderates who claim membership in this congressional consortium have taken money from none other than George Soros and friends.

Just now we hear about House GOP leaders scuttling a vote on a $51 billion dollar budget-cut package. Why? Because they’re worried about the backlash coming from…whom else…MODERATE REPUBLICANS who have chosen to toe the line of their Democratic friends.

What in the world is happening here? Did we somehow enter a cohones free zone? Is everyone wearing skirts with embroidered pink elephants on them?

JEEZ.

Where is my conservative party? Where ‘o where can they be?

It’s The Economy, Stupid

The U.S. economy has now grown for 4 years. The growth has been the most steady, non-volatile expansion in 60 years.

With unemployment at 5 percent following the creation of four million jobs during the past 24 months; with the economy having grown by more than 7.5 percent over the past two years; and with annual increases in productivity averaging 3.6 percent during the last four years, the U.S. economy shows little sign of running out of steam as its expansion enters its fifth year.

And what do the Democrats have to say about that?

***crickets***

Exactly.