There must be a bunch of 7th graders working at Reuters these days. What else could explain this?
MORE: Editor & Publisher has background. Looks like the juvenile in question is staffer Rick Wilking, who apparently has nothing better to do.
STILL MORE: The story behind the story. Wilking isn’t to blame here, his editor is.
Some of us are REPUBLICANS, and then some of us are (R)epublicans.
Senator Arlen Specter, (R)epublican, tries but fails to snag Supreme Court nominee John Roberts in a line of questioning around Roe v. Wade.
The first question out of the box in the Senate Judiciary Committee came from the panel’s chairman, Arlen Specter. Media reports of Roberts’ answers have focused on his admission that Roe v. Wade is a long-standing precedent, but they have not focused on his comments setting up reasons for overturning the 1973 decision.
During his questioning, Specter sought to lay the groundwork for regarding Roe v. Wade as a Supreme Court decision that shouldn’t be overturned because a generation of Americans have come to regard it as part of their lives.
“People have ordered their thinking and living around Roe,” Specter said. “For two decades of economic and social developments, people have organized intimate relationships in reliance on the availability of abortion.”
“Would you agree with that,” Specter asked?
Roberts didn’t take the bait. He said that, while precedent is important, new facts and information could provide a basis for the Supreme Court to overturn a bad precedent-setting decision like Roe.
“Whether or not particular precedents have proven to be unworkable is another consideration on the other side — whether the doctrinal bases of a decision had been eroded by subsequent developments,” Roberts said.
“For example, if you have a case in which there are three precedents that lead and support that result and in the intervening period two of them have been overruled, that may be a basis for reconsidering the prior precedent,” Roberts explained.
Specter, who backs abortion, then tried to trap Roberts by getting him to say new facts and information hasn’t made the Roe precedent one that should be reversed.
“I feel the need to stay away from a discussion of particular cases,” Roberts said.
Again, Specter asked, “Well, do you see any erosion of precedent as to Roe?”
Roberts declined the trapping question a second time: “Well, again, I think I should stay away from discussions of particular issues that are likely to come before the court again.”
Later, Roberts said providing a “jolt” to the court is sometimes necessary when a bad decision has stood for too long.
And in my opinion, a review of that ruling is overdue.
I think the most incredible statement from Specter is this one:
“People have ordered their thinking and living around Roe,” Specter said. “For two decades of economic and social developments, people have organized intimate relationships in reliance on the availability of abortion.”
Does this statement have any basis in reality? Yes, unfortunately, it does, but this is hardly a compelling reason for the court to keep its hands off of Roe. I’m surprised Specter decided to use this to frame his question.
But forget about the framing…the statement alone is amazing. Who knew Arlen was an advocate for free love? No responsibilities, no consequences. The convenience of abortion availability is what counts I guess. Guilt? Regret? Yeah, well maybe, but the pharmaceutical companies who manufacture anti-depressants have solved that problem, right Arlen?
The cheapening of human life can be…chilling.
Visit any one of a number of MSM news sites or left-leaning political blogs and you’ll think that George W. Bush is in the tank. He’s washed up. He’s a looooooser. Hurricane Katrina was the nail in the coffin and he is (along with the entire GOP) going down.
Funny, that’s not what I see in the latest Gallup Poll. Ankle Biting Pundits posted the results today and adds a few notes too.
GALLUP POLL RESULTS:
Initial Response (total good)
44% (good) George W Bush
39% (good) Residents of New Orleans
38% (good) State and local officials in Louisiana
36% (good) FEMA/federal agencies
NOTE: The President’s INITIAL response to Katrina was rated higher than ANY of the other options — Does anyone remember reading this anywhere . . . nuf said?!Recent Response (total good)
58% (good) George W Bush
59% (good) Residents of New Orleans
57% (good) State and local officials in LA
56% (good) FEMA/federal agenciesFederal Government:
Despite the Mediacrats best efforts, Gallup discovered that 60% of repondents still had confidence in the federal government’s ability to handle natural disasters and 63% had confidence in the government’s ability to handle terrorist attacks.The President’s Job Approval:
46% approve
[UP from last week’s 45% and last month’s 40% . . . similar to Rasmussen’s 47% approval (50% likely voters) and certainly much higher than the BOGUS ratings recently published by AP, Newsweek and ABCNews/WashPost]The Blame Game:
49% of Americans say the media are spending too much time trying to affix blame
48% say the same about Democrat leaders in Congress
31% say the same about Republican leaders in Congress
[Not all Americans are brain dead sheeple!]
I’ve been reading how many claim that Bush would have never taken responsibility for the Feds lackluster initial response to the Hurricane unless the polls told him to. Now, if we were talking about Bill Clinton, I’d agree wholeheartedly. That man wouldn’t comb his hair until he read a poll that showed over 50% approval for placing his part on the left.
While I have no doubt that many in the White House do read polls and attempt to act on them, I don’t believe that Bush makes a final decision based solely on a popularity percentage. There are a lot of things he wouldn’t have done as president if he was strictly poll led.
I think most Americans know that Bush is the type of guy to admit fault when he truly believes he’s to blame. This drives the Left crazy because he won’t admit to the things they think are his fault.
So, why did he take the blame this time? First of all, Bush felt bad about what happened in New Orleans. He was embarrassed by the lame response of FEMA and other federal departments. With all the talk of fighting a war against the terrorists and never letting 9/11 happen again, he couldn’t deny the fact that his homeland security muscle wasn’t in the shape he thought it was. In other words, his credibility was shaken.
The U.S. continues to be more vulnerable than Bush would like, and it is his responsibility to patch the weak spots. How often has he looked into the camera and said his number one job as president is to keep Americans safe? Hurricane Katrina put the fear of God back into him, forcing the question, “what if the U.S. had been hit with nuclear terrorism instead of a natural disaster?”
He didn’t like the answer. That’s why he stood up in front of the American public yesterday and did the right thing. He told everyone he didn’t like what saw, and he’ll work to fix it.
I don’t believe the Gallup Poll had anything to do with his speech yesterday. I think it accurately reflects what most Americans feel about George W. Bush. He’s genuine, he’s sincere, and (like it or not) he means what he says.
Others: Junk Yard Blog – “Bush needs to defend himself and not try to win over the Left” | Bill Quick – “I see this meme setting in among those spinning pro-Bush regarding his apology for the performance of the feds in the Katrina NOLA fiasco. Unfortunately, it’s B.S.” |
If you don’t understand what all the hubbub is about, Ace provides a brief primer that will bring you up to speed. I know of a few people who will be ‘live-blogging’ this tonight. I won’t be, since I’m on PDT and will still be at the day job.
The Carnival of the Vanities turns three years old today. Congratulations Silflay.
Is it me or are Democrats angry that Bush publicly took the blame today for all the things the Feds didn’t do right in the Gulf Coast? Isn’t that what they wanted him to do? Yet, the moment he does it, they are mad that he did it.
Found over on BOPNews — ‘Getting Real About Impeachment’ by one Shaula Evans. If you didn’t already know, there are some serious cases of Moonbat-itus over at this blog. I’m mean, serious! And Shaula’s got it baaaad.
Here’s her suggestions on how to kick Bush out of office:
To get rid of Bush before 2008, the task is twofold:
1. Take back Congress — or, at least enough seats to make an impeachment possible. (Half of the House. Two thirds of the Senate.)
This isn’t easy. I don’t know if it is possible. But if you want to make it happen, start TODAY. Don’t wait for election day in 2006–get involved with your upcoming House and Senate races NOW–donate, volunteer, get involved in any way you can.
Two words Shaula. Pixie Dust.
2. Dilute Brand GOP
Right now, the Republican party embraces Bush. Don’t let the Katrina debacle be pinned on Bush alone. Tar the entire Republican party with the same brush. Hang the criminal negligence on all of them.
In other words, make it worth their while to choose to divorce themselves from Bush.
OK, just a second. Hang on just one minute. Let me get this straight. Democrats are suppose to convince Republicans that they should “divorce themselves” from George W. Bush. Heh. Heh. Heh.
Heh heh.
Hehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehe!
Oh, (ahem) heh. OK, heh heh. Alrighty…I’ve got it together now, sorry.
The most obvious way they can announce that divorce to their constituents, to the country and to the world is to support a Bush impeachment.
Short version: wishful thinking isn’t going to give you an impeachment. If you want to get rid of Bush, roll up your sleeves and work for it.
Oh, I can’t stand it any longer.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.
Shaula…you’re a piece of work.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.
I don’t understand this at all.
Contrary to earlier reports, it appears that Superdome officials aren’t quite ready to demolish the 30+ year old structure.
Experts will have to clean and decontaminate the Louisiana Superdome before the stadium’s future can be determined.
Superdome officials took their first look at the Superdome, which was wrecked while housing thousands of people seeking refuge from Hurricane Katrina, on Friday. Those officials said Tuesday that mounds of trash have been removed from the concourses and the interior is still dark, waterlogged and vile smelling.
The roof sustained large gashes during the hurricane and the rubber coating that covered the huge dome was blown off. Water leaked throughout the building, flooding corridors outside the first-floor locker rooms and suites, pouring down elevator shafts and sending water-logged acoustic tiles crashing onto soaked carpets.
Electricity went off during the hurricane and a generator powered only emergency lighting. There was no air conditioning and large areas of the building, including the bathrooms, were completely dark.
“There is substantial damage, but we have to wait to see what its long-term effect on the structure will be,” said Glenn Menard, Superdome manager.
Given what went on in there, why is it so necessary to salvage this place? Is it because the cost of replacement would be too high? What?
Any decision that did not involve restoring the Superdome would be an unpopular one, Menard said.
“Everyone has a Superdome story about being at an event in the building: the Pope’s visit, a concert, a sporting event, even their prom. I’m sure that love of the dome will be part of any decision made about it,” Menard said.
“It’s been a part of the city’s skyline for 30 years. I hope it will remain a part of the skyline.”
The love of the dome huh?
How about this? Let a news organization publish unedited photos of the trash, the piles of human waste, and the dead bodies that were strewn about the Superdome and then we can see who is in favor of buying a corporately sponsored box seat to watch New Orleans Saints Football.
Forget about the fact that the structure is trashed…people suffered and died in there! The dome is a symbol of pain and agony. There’s no love inside anymore. Dressing up the broken parts and slapping on a new coat of paint won’t remove the hellish memories of the nightmare experienced by the refugees who survived for days in the building. More importantly, bringing the structure up to spec won’t honor the victims who died there.